DE | EN

References

Track Record

Since 2002, we have acted in 59 proceedings under German stock corporation law involving listed and unlisted companies – as court-appointed auditors (26), as court-appointed experts (19) and as party-appointed experts (14). Only mandates from publicly known proceedings are listed here; party expert opinions are subject to confidentiality.

Sectors of structural measure mandates since 2002

Banks and financial services Insurance and building societies Real estate companies and real estate Chemicals and pharmaceuticals Technology and software Telecommunications Industry and vehicle manufacturing Retail and e-commerce Hospitality Logistics Media and art market Textile industry Agriculture Investment companies

Original quotes from court decisions

Quality can be claimed – or documented. Here we quote verbatim from published court decisions on our expert opinions and audit reports.

“The Chamber knows the expert Creutzmann from a number of other proceedings in which he dealt with even difficult questions of business valuation in a highly knowledgeable manner.”

Regional Court Munich I, 22 June 2022, case 5 HK O 16226/08
Squeeze-out HypoVereinsbank AG
Court-appointed expert

“… the extensive and convincing expert opinion of the court-appointed expert.”

Regional Court Cologne, 28 Oct 2022, case 82 O 49/14
Squeeze-out Generali Deutschland Holding AG
Court-appointed expert

The expert had determined the enterprise value of DVAG “in a comprehensible and convincing manner” – on the basis of a “comprehensive analysis of the economic situation” and “extensively reasoned, plausible conclusions”.

Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf, 6 May 2026, case I-26 W 8/23
Squeeze-out Generali Deutschland Holding AG
Court-appointed expert

“The adjustment mechanism developed by the expert … is comprehensible and beyond objection. The expert explained the adjustment of revenues in his report comprehensively.”

Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf, 18 Mar 2024, case I-26 W 13/20
Squeeze-out Altana AG
Court-appointed expert

“… [the result] that the expert determined and explained as plausibly as convincingly.”

Higher Regional Court Frankfurt a. M., 6 June 2019, case 21 W 68/13
Squeeze-out Dresdner Bank AG
Court-appointed expert

“… the court-appointed auditor carried out very thorough independent analyses, valuations and calculations …, which are … not limited to mere ‘verification’ …”

Regional Court Stuttgart, 12 Sept 2022, case 31 O 12/17 KfH SpruchG
Squeeze-out Primion Technology AG
Court-appointed auditor · IVA

“… a court-appointed expert [is] not required, because the hearing of the court-appointed auditors has already led to a result that is convincing to the Chamber.”

Regional Court Munich I, 29 Apr 2020, case 5 HK O 12922/18
Squeeze-out Custodia Holding AG
Court-appointed auditor · IVA

“The Senate therefore follows the court-appointed auditor …” – whose planning assumptions are “comprehensible and plausible”.

Bavarian Supreme Regional Court, 18 May 2022, case 101 ZBR 97/20
Squeeze-out Custodia Holding AG
Court-appointed auditor · IVA

“… the court-appointed auditor [has] relied [on the relevant factors] with well-comprehensible reasons …” – the Senate followed her.

Higher Regional Court Frankfurt a. M., 9 Feb 2024, case 21 W 129/22
Squeeze-out ISRA VISION AG (Atlas Copco)
Court-appointed auditor · IVA

“The liquidity analysis conducted by the court-appointed auditor showed that the share price was meaningful without restriction throughout the entire reference period.”

Regional Court Munich I, 13 Feb 2026, case 5 HK O 14435/24
Squeeze-out EQS Group AG
Court-appointed auditor · IVA

Our complete list of mandates and roles is available in our company presentation. We are happy to send it to you by e-mail. → Contact